PHY480 - Computational Physics
Instructor Phil Duxbury (BPS 4260, duxbury at pa.msu.edu)
TA Connor Glosser
Regular class times 10:20-11:40am, Tuesday and Thursday
Additional Laboratory times Tuesday 3-5pm BPS1240
International option
The international option is in collaboration with
Technical University Delft, in Delft the Netherlands. In the international option
coding may be done in either C++ or Fortran 90, the choice being made by
each group of students.
Co-instructor for the International option: Prof. Jos Thijssen.
Course Outline
This course involves developing Fortran (or C++ for the international
option) code and using it to simulate
several different systems of broad interest in physics. The main
projects are based on the following methods / problems which form the basis of
computational physics:
Monte Carlo Methods.
Molecular Dynamics Methods
Eigenvalue problems
Differential equations
The projects
Getting to know Fortran:
To get started do the first two worksheets in the
introduction to fortran course. There you will find a summary of Fortran syntax,
some examples and a more comprehensive introduction to Fortran 90. A summary
of linux commands is also there.
First Project - PHY480
MC methods I and Outline of the first project
MC methods II
You should write your report in latex with the figures
embedded in the text. Here is a template to use.
mclectures1.tex
This contains a figure and is called in such a way that the
figure needs to be in the same directory as the .tex file. Here is the figure.
harding2.jpeg
.
To create a .pdf file from the .tex file you only need to enter "pdflatex mclecture1.tex"
to create a file called mclecture1.pdf. There are many good online introductions
to latex. One aspect not required for the first project report is the
use of a bibliography file. That will be introduced in the second
project report. Send a .pdf of your report and a copy of your code by
email, due Thursday March 1st. Note that during the week of Feb. 6th, we will
work on a project involving MD simulations jointly with the dutch
Dutch students.
First project: ICCP - MD for Argon
The report Each person may write their own report, using
the same data as their partners. Alternatively a joint report
with the dutch partners is acceptable, provided you understand
and participate in writing all parts of the report. The report should be
written in .tex. Please send a copy of your report (.pdf) and
a copy of your code by email, the due date is March TBA. Here is some
background that you might find useful.
mdlecture1.pdf
Introduction to MD and outline of the second project.
twoparticles.f90
A fortran 90 code for MD simulation of two particles in LJ potential
fcc.f90
A fortran 90 code to generate an fcc lattice
fcc.nb
A Mathematica code to visualize the fcc lattice
mdlecture2.pdf
More information on the MD project and some useful coding tricks.
Second Project - ICCP: Due April 16
Advanced Monte Carlo Methods:
The three
options are outlined in the lecture notes
ICCPProject2.pdf
More detailed background to the three options will be posted soon.
Background to the polymer MC project (Option 1) is given in the
Polymer physics and algorithms Review
Background to the Ising cluster Algorithm project (Option 2) is given in the
Ising MC paper
Background to the Quantum Monte Carlo project (Option 3) is given in the
Variational QMC lecture notes.
Original Scanned Version (large file)
Third Project, ICCP: Due one day before laboratory exam:
Here are the two options for the
third project
Details of the
tight binding project (Option 1);
and a paper
on tight binding for graphene.
a paper on localization in quantum percolation.
A paper on localization in the Anderson model.
a review of localization
Details of the
charge injection project (Option 2)
1D device model paper of Koster et al.
Another useful reference
describes modeling of solar cells in higher dimensions.
Course evaluation
For each project you will write a report, which contains
the objective of the calculations, your code, and the results you generated
using your code. These reports constitute 75% of the grade. There will be a 1 hour final
lab exam based on your projects. . These meetings will be held
in BPS1240. During your "final" meeting we will discuss your project reports and codes that
you hand in, and you will be asked to run your algorithms to illustrate
some issues. In addition you will be asked to make relatively minor modifications
of your codes to calculate new things.
Reference materials
PHY201 - introduction
to fortran. This is the introductory Fortran course. The worksheets have some sample
programs.
Fortran 90 reference card
Here is a more complete
summary of Fortran 90 which we shall refer to during the course. It comes from the
www site
Here is a list of
useful unix commands and an introduction to
Linux Computing in BPS1240.
The worksheets for the
PHY201 might be also useful
Recommended text
Computational phyiscs, J.M. Thijssen (Cambridge University Press,1999)
Other useful books
Introduction to computer simulations methods, Second Edition.
H. Gould and J. Tobochnik (Addison-Wesley,1996)
Molecular modeling for beginners, A Hinchcliffe (Wiley,2003)
"An introduction to Fortran 90 for scientific computing", by James M. Ortega.
A more advanced book is
"Fortran 90/95 explained" second edition. by Michael Metcalf and
John Reid. Oxford University Press, 1999.
A nice (free) online book containing Fortran 77, Fortran 90 and C++ codes for
a wide range of useful procedures is
Numerical recipes online . They are charging for later editions.
Some other useful links
Fortran tutorial
Python reference card
C++ reference card
Michael Feig's Lecture notes on biomolecular
simulations using CHARMM. Read this to learn how to define the energy functions.
Review of Monte Carlo
Methods for proteins (.pdf file). Read this to learn how to choose the Monte Carlo moves.
The rational behind force fields
The CHARMM22 force field for proteins
Review of simulation
methods for macromolecules by Kurt Kremer (.pdf file)
c++ or f90 - you make the call
C++ is better for scientific computing
f90 is better, including efficiency comparisons